🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."